Notinasnaid 08:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Reply In "Current version 2.x has no such criticism" someone removed the "citation needed" with the comment "citation needed for saying there is nothing to cite". It really isn't the job of Wikipedia to say some software is better than another. Current version 2.x has no such criticism." It only existed in this form because someone added a citation to the review, but selectively quoted from it, missing out the second point (and indeed, claiming the opposite: the history tells the story). Version 1.x has, however, been criticised for excessive memory usage. Notinasnaid 08:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC) Reply Actually, I would favour removing the whole of " It is notable for its short load time and small filesize, which are sometimes favorably compared to Adobe Reader. The guidance in Wikipedia:External links is that the mere fact that a linked page no longer exists isn't a good reason to remove the citation. The note "Editorial review of Foxit PDF Reader on CNet." refers to a review that no longer exists, based on a version that is no longer current. Have a look on to get more information. :) And please put new content on this talk page at the end of the page to make it easier to find Dsergeant 15:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Reply They do though do Pro versions and various other products which they do charge for (just as Adobe do). This product is not free, as is mentioned in the article. Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.4.97.194 ( talk) 23:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Reply I've downloaded Foxit Reader and could not find the malware. I followed the link of the prev poster and saw that Foxit responded that they removed the Ask.com malware when they became aware of it. My avast! firewall automatically created a rule for Ask.com when installing Foxit Reader last week without the toolbar ever being mentioned during setup. Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.86.184.60 ( talk) 00:47, 20 July 2010 (UTC) Reply Still contains malware. This is really something people should be warned about. What's more, the options for installing this intrusive, stealthed add-on are presented in an unusually convoluted, unintuitive way-so that even if the user clears the checkboxes for installing the add-on, then clicks the highlighed "I Accept" button (on the same screen), the add-on is installed anyway.Īnyway, I'm not just being dramatic. Hides itself-from both Add/Remove Programs, and in the user's file system-so it's nearly impossible for the average user to uninstall.Locks the user's Internet settings so they can't change these back.Sets the user's homepage to a big Ask.Com page.Sets the user's default search engine to Ask.Com. So friends it is an amazing software for pdf file reading, you can foxit reader free download from given above download button and install, and enjoy it.The bundled Ask.Com software now actually hijacks the user's default browser, doing the following (which I'm repeating here from the article, in case it's subsequently edited out): Users can take helps to use Group Policy for menu and configuration settings, the SCUP Catalog to import and deploy the latest updates through Windows Update Services, XML Configuration to customize mass deployments, and the Setup Customization Tool for installer configuration. Be secure from vulnerabilities by using Trust Manager/Safe Mode, ASLR & DEP, Disable JavaScript, and Security Warning Dialogs. Sign documents in your own handwriting or use eSignature and verify the status of digital signatures. There are powerful protection options in this application.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |